Encryption debate heats up at CyberSweden

Should governments be allowed backdoors into encrypted communication? At the CyberSweden 2025 conference, Chalmers researcher Elena Pagnin joined experts from Signal, Karlstad University, Cleura and RISE to discuss the controversial proposals now on the table in Sweden and the EU.

Image 1 of 2

From left: Simone Fischer-Hübner, Elena Pagnin, Udbhav Tiwari, Arman Borghem and Katarina Boustedt.

Five people sitting on a stage, talking to each other
Two women standing together

Elena Pagnin warned that the technology simply does not allow for “decryption on demand”. A universal key would make sensitive data in banks, healthcare and businesses vulnerable. “If encryption is weakened, society as a whole is at risk,” she said.

From the legal side, Arman Borghem from Cleura commented: “Today, Sweden faces law proposals suggesting to introduce backdoors to encrypted communication, and that fundamental rights must be respected – but still providers shall comply. That is a contradiction.”

Simone Fischer-Hübner stressed that such measures would be disproportionate, harming ordinary users far more than criminals, who can always move to alternative tools. She continued: “Privacy is not only a right for individuals – it is crucial for democracy. If people feel monitored, they may stop joining demonstrations or expressing themselves freely.”

Other panellists also emphasised the democratic dimension. Broad scanning measures would not stop determined criminals, but they would erode citizens’ privacy and trust in digital systems.

Signal’s Udbhav Tiwari pointed out that once client-side scanning is in place, it can quickly be extended to other areas – from terrorism to intellectual property: “If the capability exists on your device, it will be very hard to stop laws expanding its use – today for CSAM (child sexual abuse material), tomorrow for terrorism, the next day for intellectual property.”

The message from the panel was clear: weakening encryption will not stop crime – but it will weaken democracy.

The panellists:

  • Arman Borghem, Regulatory & Compliance Advisor, Cleura
  • Katarina Boustedt (Moderator), Research Coordinator, Cybercampus Sweden
  • Simone Fischer-Hübner, Professor of Computer Science, Karlstad University, Chalmers & Cybercampus Sweden
  • Elena Pagnin, Assistant Professor in Cryptography, Chalmers
  • Udbhav Tiwari, VP Strategy & Global Affairs, Signal

You may also be interested in

1 of 3

  • Signal and the fight for private communication
    research

    Signal and the fight for private communication

    Why are encrypted messaging services so crucial – and why are they now at the centre of debate in Sweden and across Europe? At the CyberSweden conference, Udbhav Tiwari, Vice President for Strategy and Global Affairs at Signal Messenger, explained why the organisation sees itself as a counterforce to the growing normalisation of digital surveillance.

    Read more
  • CyberSweden gathered world-leading researchers at Chalmers
    entrepreneurship

    CyberSweden gathered world-leading researchers at Chalmers

    When CyberSweden took place at Chalmers, some of the world’s leading experts gathered for two intensive days of research, future challenges and lively debate. The programme ranged from technical breakthroughs and digital scams to AI security, European research policy and brand-new research findings.

    Read more
  • Young researchers in focus at CyberSweden
    doctoral studies

    Young researchers in focus at CyberSweden

    One part of the CyberSweden conference was dedicated to highlighting the next generation of research leaders in cybersecurity. During the sessions Flash Rising Stars and Flash Poster Pitches, young researchers had the opportunity to present their work and contribute to the discussion on future security challenges.

    Read more